Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pizana v. Sanmedica International LLC
as 2:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Raul Pizana, Maureen Hobbs, Charles Berglund and others
Defendant:
Sanmedica International LLC, Basic Research, LLC, BR Cos, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
McClanahan v. Hobbs
as 2:2020cv00767
Respondent:
Annik Hobbs
Petitioner:
Shane McClanahan
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Larson v. Grand Canyon University et al
as 2:2019cv00463
Defendant:
Schern Richardson Finter PLC, Margaret H. Downie, Michael Schern and others
Plaintiff:
Harland Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lakhumna v. Messenger et al
as 4:2018cv00081
Defendant:
Larry Benzon, A. Priest, Doyle Peck and others
Plaintiff:
Vivek Lakhumna
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobbs v. Allstate Corporation, The et al
as 2:2018cv00449
Plaintiff:
Mary Hobbs
Defendant:
Allstate Corporation, The and Susan Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Le v. Swensen et al
as 2:2017cv01078
Plaintiff:
Roy Le
Defendant:
Sherrie Swensen, Rashelle Hobbs and Salt Lake City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobbs v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2013cv00571
Plaintiff:
Jerry R. Hobbs
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Whitney v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
Daniel Whitney
Defendant:
Alfred Bigelow, FNU Feland, Billie Casper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Smokoff et al
as 2:2010cv01075
Plaintiff:
Michael Hobbs Thompson
Defendant:
Jeanett F. Smokoff, Rodger Brockbank, Jr., Bob Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
