Cases 31 - 40 of 210
Rodgers et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp et al
as 2:2015cv02370
Plaintiff:
Linda Rodgers , Donna Armstrong , Debra Blackwood and others
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Hoffman La Roche Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BERGER v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv02423
Plaintiff:
LISA BERGER
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC , ROCHE LABORATORIES, INC. and HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sperry v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Dolores Sperry
Defendant:
Hoffman-La Roche Inc, Roche Inc and Roche Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Fosamax
as 14-2429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA BURGHARDT and PHILLIP BURGHARDT
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HOFFMAN LA ROCHE INC and others
In re: Fosamax
as 14-2635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETTY S. TOLSTON and GARY T. TOLSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC and others
In Re: Fosamax, et al
as 14-2544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA VAUGHN
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HOFFMAN LA ROCHE INC and others
In Re: Fosamax
as 14-2207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANN P. GREENWAY and RALPH N. GREENWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC and others
In Re: Fosamax, et al
as 14-2566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUDITH BROADSTONE
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, GENENTECH INC and others
In re: Fosamax
as 14-2585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMY ALSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HOFFMAN LA ROCHE INC and others
In re: Fosamax
as 14-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA L. KNIFFEN and DONALD L. KNIFFEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE, GENETECH INC, RP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
