Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Hackborn v. Physician Health Partners et al
as 1:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Dean D. Hackborn
Defendant:
Physician Health Partners, Paula J. Frantz and Cathie Holst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hackborn v. Physician Health Partners et al
as 1:2021cv01175
Defendant:
Cathie Holst, Paula J. Frantz and Physician Health Partners
Plaintiff:
Dean D. Hackborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Elevations Credit Union Board of Directors et al
as 1:2020cv03572
Defendant:
Liz Million, Pete Reicks, Tammy Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
William Brian Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hackborn v. Frantz et al
as 1:2015cv01710
Plaintiff:
Dean D Hackborn
Defendant:
Paula J. Frantz, Cathie Holst and Bernadette Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coit v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Jill Coit
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Colorado Department of Corrections, The, James Welton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meek v. Clements et al
as 1:2011cv02840
Plaintiff:
Asa Meek
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Aristedes Zavaras, Kevin Milyard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zimmerman v. Shoemaker et al
as 1:2011cv01943
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ray Zimmerman
Defendant:
Joann Shoemaker, Cathie Holst, Burgondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zimmerman v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02607
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ray Zimmerman
Defendant:
Aristedes (I) W. Zavaras, Aristedes W. Zavaras, Paul (I) L'Herault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2010cv02171
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zimmerman v. Singh et al
as 1:2010cv00754
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ray Zimmerman
Defendant:
(I) Singh, Singh, (I) L'Herault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
