Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Babbitt's Sports Center, LLC v. Holzhauer Auto and Truck Sales, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
Babbitt's Sports Center, LLC
Defendant:
Holzhauer Auto and Truck Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2012md02311
Plaintiff:
A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc., AGA Realty LLC, Ifeoma Adams and others
Defendant:
AB SKF, ALPS Electric (North America), Inc., Alps Automotive, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Timmy A. Curtis, Sherman Bearings, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., Thomas Saris, Jim Sciaroni and others
Petitioner:
Sandra Singer and David Dishman
Respondent:
Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A. Inc.
In Re:
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Special Master:
Gene J. Esshaki
Intervenor:
Financial Recovery Services, LLC and United States of America
Claimant:
Certain End-Payor Settlement Class Members and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.
Instrument Panel Clusters - Dealership Actions
as 2:2012cv00202
In Re:
Instrument Panel Clusters - Dealership Actions
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc, Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. 12-11156 Doing business as Landers Toyota, Hammett Motor Company, Inc and others
Defendant:
Yazaki Corporation, Yazaki North America, Incorporated, Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. and others
Interested Party:
American Furukawa Inc., Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd., Katherine Clemons and others
Fuel Senders - Dealership Actions
as 2:2012cv00302
In Re:
Fuel Senders - Dealership Actions
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc, Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. 12-11156 Doing business as Landers Toyota, Hammett Motor Company, Inc and others
Defendant:
Yazaki Corporation, Yazaki North America, Incorporated, Denso Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Katherine Clemons, Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd., American Furukawa, Inc. and others
Wire Harness - Lead Case
as 2:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Ifeoma Adams, Jude Anheluk, Archer-Perdue, Inc., d/b/a Archer-Perdue Suzuki and others
Defendant:
American Furukawa, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG and others
In Re:
Wire Harness - Lead Case
Interested Party:
Mitsuba Corporation and American Mitsuba Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Grupo Antolin North America, Incorporated
Dale Martens Nissan Subaru, Inc. et al v. Yazaki Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv10161
Plaintiff:
Dale Martens Nissan Subaru, Inc., Green Team of Clay Center, Inc., McGrath Automotive Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Yazaki Corporation, Yazaki North America, Inc., Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Dale Martens Nissan Subaru, Incorporated et al v. Yazaki Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv13556
Plaintiff:
DALE MARTENS NISSAN SUBARU, INC., GREEN TEAM OF CLAY CENTER, INC., McGRATH AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. and others
Defendant:
YAZAKI CORPORATION, YAZAKI NORTH AMERICA, INC., DENSO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd. et al
as 2:2014cv14721
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd. and Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc.
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2014cv14719
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD. and TOYO AUTOMOTIVE PARTS (USA), INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Inverters - Dealership Actions
as 2:2013cv01802
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd., Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc., Denso Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
