Cases 21 - 27 of 27
WRAY et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2015cv00530
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff:
DONNA PRINCE and JUDITH WRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PARKS et al v. FREUD AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00036
Defendant:
FREUD AMERICA, INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE J. PARKS and RICK M. PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
RICHMAN et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2009cv00940
Plaintiff:
ANITA RICHMAN and CHARLES RICHMAN
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KING v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2009cv00546
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE W. KING
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. v. M.G.R., INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00091
Plaintiff:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Defendant:
M.G.R., INC., M.G.R., INC., PERKINS LOGISTICS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
MGR, INC. v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
MGR, INC., MGR, INC., MGR, INC. and others
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., PERKINS LOGISTICS, LLC, PERKINS LOGISTICS, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., GMR TRANSPORTATION and others
Cross Defendant:
ACE LOGISTICS, INC., AGI LOGISTICS, AGI LOGISTICS and others
Counter Defendant:
MGR, INC., HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Mass Financial Corp.
Counter Claimant:
GMR TRANSPORTATION, GMR TRANSPORTATION, ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
