Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Hoover et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07107
Plaintiff:
Chari Hoover and George Robert Hoover
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arthurs et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv26901
Plaintiff:
Marcia Arthurs and Paul Hoover
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv16694
Plaintiff:
Peggy Shannon Hoover
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06889
Plaintiff:
Sonja L. Hoover
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01264
Plaintiff:
Wanda Hoover and Kevin Hoover
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kwasniewski et al v. Medventure Technology Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv32583
Plaintiff:
Rita Kwasniewski , Darlene Bell , Melinda Bradford and others
Defendant:
MedVenture Technology Corporation and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32159
Plaintiff:
Catheryn Hoover
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30237
Plaintiff:
Melody Hoover and Greg Hoover
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv26279
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Hoover and David Hoover
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv24777
Plaintiff:
Darlene S. Hoover
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
