Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Arguijo v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Hope Arguijo
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Adult & Teen Challenge et al.
as 4:2023cv02248
Plaintiff:
Monty Robinson
Defendant:
Adult & Teen Challenge, Joey Vorheez, Bob Pavlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mauer v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Mauer
Defendant:
Norman Jacobs and Hope L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Hope C. Zins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mauer v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Mauer
Defendant:
Norman Jacobs and Hope L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopings v. Foley
as 3:2023cv00980
Petitioner:
Lawrence Hopings
Respondent:
Warden Keith Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogya v. Culotta et al
as 1:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
Hope Hogya
Defendant:
Judge Vincent Culotta and Brent Urankar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vandegrift v. Akron Municipal Court et al
as 5:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Maryann Hope Vandegrift
Defendant:
Akron Municipal Court, Medina Municipal Court and Cambridge Municipal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOF FINANCE, LLC v. The Old Nocona Boot Factory, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
GOF FINANCE, LLC
Defendant:
The Old Nocona Boot Factory, LLC, Chief Nocona, LLC, Craig Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Coffman v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
HOPE L. COFFMAN
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
