Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hopper v. Field Asset Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01529
Plaintiff:
Richard Hopper
Defendant:
Field Asset Services, Inc., Field Asset Services, LLC, Xome Field Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Daniel Salazar et al v. Rafaela T. King et al
as 2:2021cv06030
Plaintiff:
Daniel Salazar, Michael Shaw, Daniel Gomez and others
Defendant:
Rafaela T King, City of Compton, DOES 1 - 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hopper v. MGK Visions Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01139
Plaintiff:
Steven Hopper
Defendant:
MGK Visions Inc. and Zen Studios Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hopper v. MGK Visions Inc. et al
as 2:2017at00879
Plaintiff:
Steven Hopper
Defendant:
MGK Visions Inc. and Zen Studios Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ricardo Acosta et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2014cv05690
Plaintiff:
Steve Sainz, Martin Martinez, Lee Jensen and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Steven Pearl
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hopper v. Hartford Life Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv02929
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Hopper
Defendant:
Hartford Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
In re Field Asset Services, Inc., et al.
as 3:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Fred Bowerman, Julia Bowerman, Tim Purkett and others
Defendant:
Field Asset Services LLC, Field Asset Services, Inc., Xome Field Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Roberto Alaniz v. Los Angeles City of et al
as 2:2004cv08592
Plaintiff:
Annissa Elaine Harsma, Barry Brooks, Omar Veloz and others
Petitioner:
Ofelia Tello and Bernard Pulliam
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
