Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Horton v. Tayloe, et al
as 23-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD EMMITT TAYLOE, MICHAEL CHARLES FLANAGAN, GERLAD FRANK NEUWIRTH and others
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner:
STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Horton v. Tayloe et al
as 5:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Donald Emmitt Tayloe, Michael Charles Flanagan, Gerald Frank Neuwirth and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Morales et al v. Forte Data Systems, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00208
Respondent:
Forte Data Systems, Inc.
Petitioner:
Kurt Morales, II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. Garland
as 22-6193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Horton v. Garland
as 5:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Draper et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv02038
Plaintiff:
Scott Draper, Russell Ford, Ryan Frost and others
Defendant:
Justin Brown, Adam Horton, Jeremy Bennett and others
Horton v. Hoffman, et al
as 22-6122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JARED HOFFMAN, Lawton Postmaster and STEPHEN ESCHENBACHER, Oklahoma-Arkansas District Supervisor
Horton v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Federal Personnel Records Center and National Guard Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
