Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mays v. Grady County Jail, et al
as 24-6003
Plaintiff:
OTIS MAYS
Defendant:
GRADY COUNTY JAIL, GRADY COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, FNU CARPENTER and others
Amaro v. Corizon Health, et al
as 23-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH, INC., UNKNOWN DENTIST #1 and others
Chavez v. Horton, et al
as 23-2084
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO CHAVEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Brown v. Attorney General of the State of New Mexico, et al
as 23-2081
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROY BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and MAJOR HORTON, Warden
Navarette v. Horton, et al
as 22-2127
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARNOLDO NAVARETTE
Respondent / Appellee:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden of the Guadalupe County Correctional Facility and HECTOR BALDERAS, JR., Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Franklin v. Horton, et al
as 22-2030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYCE FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU HORTON, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Copeland v. County of Chautauqua, et al
as 16-3322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY G. COPELAND, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CHAUTAUQUA, ROGER GOSSARD, District Court Judge, Montgomery County District Court, LARRY MARKLE, Montgomery County Attorney and others
Crawford v. Horton
as 12-5086
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN DWANE CRAWFORD
Respondent - Appellee:
DANNY HORTON, Warden
Horton v. Martin
as 12-6116
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS EUGENE HORTON
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY MARTIN
Kirby v. Ezell, et al
as 09-2300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD KIRBY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT EZELL, Warden, in his official and individual capacity, SHANNON MCREYNOLDS, in his/her official and individual capacity, MAJOR HORTON, Operations, Lea County Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
