Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Horton v. Bell
as 24-1127
Petitioner: BENJAMIN HORTON
Respondent: EARL BELL, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
United States of America v. Spearman
as 24-469
Defendant: HENRY HORTON, JAYQUAN MARTIN, KISHON SHIELDS and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1225
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1185
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1027
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Horton v. Bell
as 23-6417
Appellant: BENJAMIN HORTON
Appellee: EARL BELL
Roundtree-McCrorey v. Coombs Family
as 22-3049
Plaintiff: McCrorey Family, Andrew McCrorey, Jr., National Dairy Products and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey
Defendant / Appellee: Coombs Family, Comb Family, Elizabeth Horton Sheff and others
United States of America v. Smith
as 22-2823
Plaintiff / Appellant: United States of America
Defendant / Appellee: Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
Defendant: Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany and others
United States of America v. Smith
as 22-2217
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany and others
Defendant / Appellant: Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
United States of America v. Horton
as 22-1339
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Ronald Horton

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?