Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Horton v. Bell
as 24-1127
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN HORTON
Respondent:
EARL BELL, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
United States of America v. Spearman
as 24-469
Defendant:
HENRY HORTON, JAYQUAN MARTIN, KISHON SHIELDS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: ROI Network, LLC
as 3:2022mc00093
Respondent:
ROI Network, LLC doing business as Auto Defender and ROI Network, LLC a Connecticut limited liability company doing business as Auto Defender
Petitioner:
Kurt Morales, II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Alex et al v. NFL Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv09239
Plaintiff:
Jim Alex, Mark Bowers, Boyce Brown and others
Defendant:
NFL Enterprises, LLC and National Football League
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action
United States of America v. Smith
as 22-2823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany and others
United States of America v. Smith
as 22-2217
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
United States of America v. Horton
as 22-1339
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ronald Horton
United States of America v. Parrish (Lewis)
as 21-2067
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Laquan Parrish, AKA MadDog, AKA Quanzas, Andre Bent, AKA Dula, Aaron Rodriguez, AKA Gunz, AKA Cito and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jabriel Lewis, AKA Breeze, AKA Breezy
Trisvan v. Burger King Worldwide, Inc.
as 21-1173
Defendant / Appellee:
Burger King Corporation, Tim Hortons Incorporated and Restaurant Brands International
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Trisvan
Defendant:
Burger King Worldwide, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
