Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Jackson v. Horton et al
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kennin Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Kendrick Horton, Shelton Horrelle, Moses Stepan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Emmons
as 6:2023cv00013
Petitioner:
Quentin Lee Horton
Respondent:
Shawn Emmons
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton v. Emmons
as 4:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Quentin Lee Horton
Respondent:
Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv04378
Petitioner:
Charles Horton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MUDD v. JONES et al
as 4:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
DAWUAN TERRELL MUDD and DIVINE SERENITY MOON
Defendant:
WARDEN DESHAWN JONES, SGT JUAN USQUIANO, LT PERNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banda v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv02677
Plaintiff:
Alick Ricky Banda
Defendant:
Randy Davis, D. Horton, Chief of Security H. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danglar v. Horton et al
as 1:2019cv05512
Plaintiff:
Lyncoln Danglar
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Attorney General William Barr, J Suntanto and others
Not Classified By Court:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Covington Police Department
as 1:2019cv05025
Plaintiff:
Brianna C. Horton
Defendant:
Covington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Covington, GA, Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv04626
Defendant:
Pokey Daniels, Superior Court - Newton County Georgia, Q. Pitts and others
Plaintiff:
Brianna C. Horton and LaRance D. Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Horton et al
as 1:2019cv00294
Defendant:
K. Johnson, Ralph Austin, Nurse Logan and others
Plaintiff:
David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
