Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Horton v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Bettina Horton
Defendant:
Jesus Maldonado , W. Furman , Oliver Fladrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORTON v. MACON
as 5:2013cv00467
Plaintiff:
JOHN HORTON
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The Georgia Department of Human Resources v. Jenkins
as 1:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
The Georgia Department of Human Resources
Defendant:
Richard Terence Jenkins
Counter_claimant:
Richard Terence Jenkins
Counter_defendant:
The Georgia Department of Human Resources, Lisa Simmons, Keith Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Carter v. Reese et al
as 1:2013cv00884
Plaintiff:
Darryl Carter
Defendant:
Clyde Reese, III and Keith Horton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Worthy v. Deal et al
as 2:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Worthy
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Clyde L. Reese, III, Keith Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watty v. Georgia Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Keith Watty
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Human Services, Clyde L. Reese, III, Sharon King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beahm v. Georgia Department of Human Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement et al
as 1:2011cv03562
Plaintiff:
Ryan L. Beahm
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Human Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement , B. J. Walker , Keith Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
