Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Guthrie v. US Government et al
as 9:2017cv80390
Plaintiff:
Randolph H. Guthrie, III
Defendant:
US Government, Apple, Inc., AT&T Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Steven Sizemore, et al v. Hotwire Communications LLC, et al
as 16-1873
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVEN C. SIZEMORE, an individual
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DVCOMM LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
HOTWIRE COMMUNICATIONS LLC and HOTWIRE COMMUNICATIONS LTD
SIZEMORE et al v. HOTWIRE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv05543
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. SIZEMORE and DVCOMM, LLC
Defendant:
HOTWIRE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and HOTWIRE COMMUNICATIONS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Randolph Guthrie, III v. U.S. Government, et al
as 14-14047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDOLPH H. GUTHRIE, III
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, CITY OF NEW YORK, CITY OF MIAMI and others
In re: Subpoena to Hotwire Communications, Ltd.
as 2:2014mc00385
Respondent:
Hotwire Communications, Ltd.
Movant:
Rightscorp, Inc.
In Re:
Subpoena to Hotwire Communiations, Ltd.
In re: Subpoena to Hotwire Communications, Ltd.
as 2:2014mc00240
Respondent:
Hotwire Communications, Ltd.
Movant:
Rightscorp, Inc.
In Re:
Subpoena to Hotwire Communicatons, Ltd.
PORTOFINO HOMEOWNERS MASTER ASSOCIATION INC v. HOTWIRE COMMUNICATIONS LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
PORTOFINO HOMEOWNERS MASTER ASSOCIATION INC
Defendant:
HOTWIRE COMMUNICATIONS LTD and HOTWIRE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Counter_claimant:
HOTWIRE COMMUNICATIONS LLC and HOTWIRE COMMUNICATIONS LTD
Counter_defendant:
PORTOFINO HOMEOWNERS MASTER ASSOCIATION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Hotwire Communications, LLC et al
as 0:2009cv61054
Plaintiff:
Yamila Garcia and Yamila Garcia
Defendant:
Hotwire Communications, LLC, Hotwire Communications, LTD. and Kristin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
