Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Aubert v. Hampshire House
as 1:2022fp00455
Petitioner:
Chezney Aubert
Respondent:
Hampshire House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smart et al v. Strafford County et al
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Kari Smart and Cynthia Burson
Defendant:
Strafford County, Strafford County Department of Corrections, Strafford County House of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smart et al v. Strafford County et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Kari Smart and Cynthia Burson
Defendant:
Strafford County, Strafford County Department of Corrections, Strafford County House of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allen v. Hampshire House, Director et al
as 1:2019cv00385
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Regional Director and Hampshire House, Director
Petitioner:
Charles A. Allen, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cookish v. Hampshire House, Director et al
as 1:2019cv00367
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Regional Director and Hampshire House, Director
Petitioner:
Dennis R. Cookish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Buskey v. Hampshire House, Director et al
as 1:2019cv00366
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Regional Director and Hampshire House, Director
Petitioner:
Daniel Buskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stile v. US Marshals Services, et al
as 1:2015cv00494
Defendant:
American Institutional Medical Group, Raymond Bowers, FNU Brackett and others
Plaintiff:
James Stile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheney v. Carroll County House of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2010cv00202
Defendant:
Carroll County House of Corrections, Former Superintendent and Alan Drewin
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Cheney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holder v. Town of Newton, et al
as 1:2008cv00197
Plaintiff:
Ralph Holder
Defendant:
Newton, Town of, East Kingston, Town of, Joseph Saluto and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
