Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv09269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Brown, et al v. Zucker, et al
as 1:2018cv01055
Plaintiff:
DAMONI DORSEY-LOMAN, JASON WOODRUFF and JORDAN BROWN
Defendant:
New York State Department of Health ("NYSDOH"), HOWARD A. ZUCKER, Howard A. Zucker, M.D.,J.D., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maione et al v. Zucker et al
as 1:2018cv07452
Plaintiff:
Scott Maione and Tasha Ostler
Defendant:
Howard A. Zucker, Nira V Shah, Samuel D. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maione et al v. Zucker et al
as 7:2018cv07452
Defendant:
Joan Silvestri, Dr. Howard A. Zucker, Kristen M. Proud and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Maione and Tasha Ostler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kilpatrick v. Zucker
as 1:2017cv09861
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Howard A. Zucker, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Long Island Association for AIDS Care, Inc. v. DiNapoli et al
as 2:2017cv07170
Defendant:
Rexford DeVoe, Thomas DiNapoli, Sally Dreslin and others
Plaintiff:
Long Island Association for AIDS Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Maione et al v. Medical Answering Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv08106
Plaintiff:
Scott Maione and Tasha Ostler
Defendant:
Medical Answering Services, LLC , Howard A. Zucker , Samuel D. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
