Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Reginald Washington, Jr. v. Timothy Budz, et al
as 13-10881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD D. WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY BUDZ, in his individual and official capacity as Facility Administrator at Florida Civil Commitment Center, JACQUES LAMOUR, Doctor, in his individual and official capacity as Chief Health Official at Florida Civil Commitment Center, HOWARD PINSKY, ARNP, in his individual and official cpapcity as an ARNP at Florida Civil Commitment Center and others
Washington v. Budz et al
as 2:2010cv00485
Plaintiff:
Reginald D. Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Budz, Jacques Lamour, Howard Pinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Marsh v. GEO Group-Florida Atlantic, et al
as 10-11279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON K. MARSH
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP-FLORIDA ATLANTIC SHORES CORPORATION, TIMOTHY BUDZ, Facility Administrator, GEORGE E. EMANOLIDIS and others
Marsh v. GEO Group-Florida Atlantic Shores Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00084
Petitioner:
Aaron K. Marsh
Respondent:
GEO Group-Florida Atlantic Shores Corporation, Timothy James Budz, George E Emanolidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marsh v. GEO Group-Florida Atlantic Shores Corporation et al
as 9:2010cv80074
Plaintiff:
Aaron K. Marsh
Defendant:
GEO Group-Florida Atlantic Shores Corporation, Timothy James Budz, George E Emanolidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marsh v. GEO Group-Florida Atlantic Shores Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00651
Plaintiff:
Aaron K. Marsh
Defendant:
GEO Group-Florida Atlantic Shores Corporation, Timothy James Budz, Jacques Lamour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marsh v. GEO Group-Florida Atlantic Shores Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00701
Plaintiff:
Aaron K. Marsh
Defendant:
GEO Group-Florida Atlantic Shores Corporation, Barbara J. Pedersen, Jacques Lamour and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
