Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Weihmiller et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopedics
as 2:2015cv11637
Plaintiff:
Genevieve C. Weihmiller and Frederick T. Weihmiller
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopedics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kott v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 5:2015cv11349
Plaintiff:
Caron Kott
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pepke et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 2:2015cv10134
Plaintiff:
Stephen Pepke and Tara Pepke
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Good v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 5:2015cv10133
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ann Good
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nickens et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 2:2015cv10001
Plaintiff:
David C. Nickens and Christine T. Nickens
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hansell et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv02204
Plaintiff:
Jean Hansell and Steven Hansell
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyk v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 4:2014cv12138
Plaintiff:
Gregory Boyk
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fustini v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 4:2014cv11881
Plaintiff:
Lorreta A. Fustini
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smithers et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Phillip Smithers and Heidi Smithers
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bayes et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Janice Bayes and Larry Bayes
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
