Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Phillips v. Tiona, et al
as 12-1055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY ALLEN PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN TIONA, Doctor, Kit Carson Correctional Center, HOYT BRILL, Warden, Kit Carson Correctional Center, JODI GRAY, Health Administrator, Kit Carson Correctional Center and others
Bradley, Jr. v. Suthers, et al
as 11-1271
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMIE CHARLES BRADLEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN W. SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado and HOYT BRILL
Nunn v. Brill, et al
as 11-1079
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYFEAL RAYMOND NUNN
Respondent - Appellee:
HOYT BRILL, Warden of CCA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Medicine Blanket v. Brill, et al
as 10-1346
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES MEDICINE BLANKET
Respondent - Appellee:
HOYTE BRILL, Warden, K.C.C.C. and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rea v. Suthers, et al
as 10-1320
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. REA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado and HOYTE BRILL, Warden
Fish v. Brill et al
as 1:2010cv00561
Plaintiff:
Danny R. Fish
Defendant:
Hoyt Brill, Greg Wilkinson, F. Dycus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Field v. Brill et al
as 1:2010cv00255
Petitioner:
Michael C. Field
Respondent:
Hoyt Brill and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Souders v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2009cv02928
Plaintiff:
Nicholas E. Souders
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, John Ferguson and Hoyt Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Portley-El v. Brill, et al
as 09-1544
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK DURAY PORTLEY-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
HOYT BRILL, Warden, KCCC and CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Portley-El v. Brill, et al
as 09-1545
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK DURAY PORTLEY-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
HOYT BRILL, Warden, KCCC and CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
