Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Mario Abernathy v.Glenda Marti et al
as 5:2024cv01042
Defendant:
Wendy Y. Medina, Leon Carlo Sayo, Lisa Sayo and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10201
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Joel Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Eric Alcorn v. Tien Chin Yu Machinery Co., Ltd et al
as 5:2023cv00503
Defendant:
Tien Chin Yu Trading Yu Co. Ltd, Tien Chin Yu Machinery Co., Ltd, Tim Chin Yu Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Alcorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
AmGUARD Insurance Company v. Wang Hane Group, Inc., et al
as 2:2021cv06337
Plaintiff:
AmGUARD Insurance Company
Defendant:
Wang Hane Group Inc. a California corporation doing business as Monte Carlo Inn, May Hsiao Mei Wang and Sarah Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
