Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice et al
as 2:2021cv01211
Plaintiff: Geographies of Displacement University of Texas at Austin, Immigrant Justice Task Force, Wellington Avenue United Church of Christ, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2021cv01214
Plaintiff: Geographies of Displacement University of Texas at Austin, Immigrant Justice Task Force, Wellington Avenue United Church of Christ, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and others
Defendant: Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Dario Rodriguez v. E.K. McDaniels, et al
as 20-17045
Plaintiff / Appellant: DARIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, MERCADO, CRITICAL RESISTANCE, from member case 3:16-cv-609 and others
Index Newspapers LLC, et al v. United States Marshals Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35739
Plaintiff / Appellee: JUSTIN YAU, and those similarly situated, ALEX MILAN TRACY, BRIAN CONLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Defendant: CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation; and JOHN DOES, 1-60; individual and supervisory officers of Portland Police Bureau and other agencies working in concert,
Amicus Curiae: THE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH AND REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, AND 14 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS
American Immigration Council et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2020cv03265
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff: American Immigration Council, Human Rights Watch and American Immigration Lawyers Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Immigration Council et al v. United States Citizenship Immigration Services et al
as 3:2020cv03263
Plaintiff: American Immigration Council, Human Rights Watch and American Immigration Lawyers Association
Defendant: United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Citizenship Immigration Services and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Immigration Council et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv03266
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff: American Immigration Council, Human Rights Watch and American Immigration Lawyers Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55436
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Geo Group, Inc. v. Newsom et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02491
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Gavin C. Newsom and The State of California
Plaintiff: The Geo Group, Inc. and United States of America
Amicus Curiae: Human Rights Watch, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, Freedom For Immigrants and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 ij
Dario Rodriguez v. E. McDaniels, et al
as 19-16375
Plaintiff / Appellant: DARIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee: TRAVIS, Screening Order #30, LUNA, Officer, J. BISSELL and others
Defendant: U.S. SENATE, from member case 3:16-cv-00276, KATHY HARDCASTLE, Administrative Law Judge, from member case 3:16-cv-00276, KNIGHT, member case 3:16-cv-609 and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?