Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Webb-EL v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Keith Bryan Webb-EL
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and I. Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-32
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
I. JACQUEZ, Warden, D. SUH, Chaplain, B. CRAY, Counselor and others
Jonassen et al v. Jacquez et al
as 3:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Martin Jonassen and Elizabeth Mary Jonassen
Defendant:
I. Jacquez, D. Suh, B. Cray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duren v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00883
Petitioner:
Tyrone Cedric Duren
Respondent:
I. Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bowser v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Gary Bowser
Respondent:
I. Jacquez, C. Peters, I Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Valenzuela v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Emiliano Valenzuela
Respondent:
I. Jacquez, C. Peters, I Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sarr v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2023cv00107
Petitioner:
Sulayman Sarr
Respondent:
I. Jacquez, C. Peters, I Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sow v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Mamadou Sow
Respondent:
I. Jacquez, C. Peters, I Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
De Oliveira v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
Leonardo Trulsen de Oliveira
Respondent:
I. Jacquez, C. Peters, I Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
