Cases 1 - 6 of 6
I.W. v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10630
Plaintiff:
I.W.
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Werfel, et al v. The Palestine Liberation Organization, et al
as 23-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAYA WERFEL, BASYA YEHUDIS GOLDSTEIN, SHELLEY LEVINE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE PALESTINE LIBERATION ORGANIZATION, THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, AKA Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority, AKA Palestinian National Authority, RIYAD MANSOUR, as the representative of The Palestine Liberation Organization and The Palestinian Authority and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Levine et al v. Palestine Liberation Organization, The, et al
as 1:2021cv03043
Plaintiff:
Shelley Levine, Stefanie Levine, Haya Levine and others
Defendant:
The Palestine Liberation Organization, The Palestinian Authority, Palestinian Authority, The and others
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 - Anti-Terrorism Act (Definitions)
In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2020cv04699
In Re:
TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Plaintiff:
Aparna Iyer, M.P., a minor, by and through her guardian, Requeenis Gilder, N.D. Cal. Actions Interim Lead Counsel and others
Defendant:
BEIJING BYTEDANCE TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD, MUSICAL.LY, TikTok Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Meghan Smith, Loevy & Loevy, Edelson PC and others
Board of Education of Lake Forest High School District 115 v. Illinois State Board Of Education et al
as 1:2019cv04475
Plaintiff:
Board of Education of Lake Forest High School District 115
Defendant:
Illinois State Board Of Education and I.W., a minor, by and through her parents A.M.V. and D.W.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Henry I.W. Flowers v. ACandS, Inc., et al.
as MD/1:03-CV-00445
Defendant:
ACandS, Inc
Plaintiff:
Henry I.W. Flowers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
