Cases 1 - 10 of 19
TURNER v. MOTLEY RICE et al
as 1:2024cv02749
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
MOTLEY RICE, MOTLEY RICE LLC, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF STATISTICS, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-01672
as 3:2024cv01672
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
LEGAL BAY, MEGA LEADS, JAMES ALAMIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS JR. v. TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv22807
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARL DAVIS JR.
Defendant:
TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Me et al v. United States et al
as 2:2021cv19396
Plaintiff:
Jane Me, Jane Me1 and JON ROE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U.S. DHS, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2020cv02402
Defendant:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, ICE DHF and DHS
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MANUEL PEREZ
DECAMBRE v. AVILES et als
as 2:2019cv04737
Defendant:
NURSE, ICE CARTAIN FASCE, DR. PARK and others
Plaintiff:
MARK DECAMBRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAMANGA v. PORRINO et al
as 2:2017cv06233
Plaintiff:
NZEMBA ADJI KAMANGA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER PORRINO, CHARLES GREEN and OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL - DHS - ICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAOYE v. UNKNOWN ICE OFFICERS
as 3:2017cv01647
Plaintiff:
AMANDA C. LAOYE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN ICE OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
