Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Zimmerman v. City of Wickliffe et al
as 1:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
Amanda Zimmerman
Defendant:
City of Wickliffe, David Cook, Kevin Ankuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks et al v. Cranley et al
as 1:2020cv00713
Plaintiff:
People's Platform for Equality and Justice, Denise Hill, Stanford Poole and others
Defendant:
Mayor John Cranley, Council Member Landsman City Council Member, Director Art Dahlberg Buildings & Inspections Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zuelsdorf et al v. Jefferson County, Ohio et al
as 2:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
Amy Zuelsdorf and Bobbi Jo Cook
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Ohio, Fred Abdalla, Tod Hagins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Szalasny v. Ice Land USA et al
as 1:2012cv01616
Plaintiff:
Patryk Szalasny
Defendant:
Ice Land USA , City of Lakewood, Ohio and City of Brooklyn, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
