Cases 1 - 10 of 11
USA v. Contents of Robinhood Account ending in 3368 et al
as 3:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
CONTENTS OF ROBINHOOD ACCOUNT ENDING IN 3368, USER ID 233dacb2-481d-4518-8228-9ce00d0ce42a and Contents of Robinhood Account ending in 3368
Claimant:
Hamed Ghorbani-Moghaddam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. Contents of Binance Account Held by User ID 328682551
as 3:2023mc00034
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Contents of Binance Account Held by User ID 328682551
Spearman v. Ide et al
as 3:2017cv00543
Plaintiff:
Quanell Spearman
Defendant:
Joel Ide, Lou Renzi and Paul Rousseau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ride, Inc et al v. APS Technology, Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01721
Plaintiff:
Ride, Inc and Russell D Ide
Defendant:
APS Technology, Inc. and William E Turner
Interested Party:
Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. RI Reg. No. 1789NE, Hull Id No. CRSUSB46A000 et al
as 3:2012cv01350
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
RI Reg. No. 1789NE, Hull Id No. CRSUSB46A000
Claimant:
Gary F. Anusavice and New England Preservation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Petaway v. Milling et al
as 3:2011cv00426
Plaintiff:
William Petaway
Defendant:
Lynn Milling, Theresa Lantz, Mary Marcial and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Lantz et al
as 3:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
Felipe Colon
Defendant:
Theresa Lantz, Frederick Levesque, Joe Ide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Garza v. Lantz et al
as 3:2008cv00015
Plaintiff:
Cesar De La Garza
Defendant:
Theresa Lantz, Joe Ide, Sydney Schulman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins v. Lantz et al
as 3:2007cv01542
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Goins
Defendant:
Theresa Lantz, Joel Ide, Wayne Choinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
