Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sypolt et al v. The Illinois Gaming Board et al
as 1:2019cv05991
Defendant:
Mark Ostrowski, Anthony Garcia, Thomas Hobgood and others
Plaintiff:
Trudy's Cafe, LLC, Kevin Sypolt and Phase IV-D, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv04050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorobanov et al v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01025
Plaintiff:
Svetoslav Dorobanov , Paul Jovenich and Randy Binning
Defendant:
Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc, Harrah's Illinois Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kejbo v. Illinois State Police, et al
as 1:2015cv10751
Plaintiff:
Isom Kejbo
Defendant:
Illinois State Police, Illinois Gaming Board, Eric Caho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marino v. Nauyalis et al
as 1:2011cv22456
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Marino
Defendant:
Joseph Vincent Nauyalis, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Gnutek, et al v. Illinois Gaming Board, et al
as 11-1926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN GNUTEK and THOMAS HOBGOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS GAMING BOARD, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MARK T. OSTROWSKI and others
Hobgood v. Illinois Gaming Board et al
as 1:2008cv05516
Plaintiff:
John Gnutek and Thomas Hobgood
Defendant:
Illinois Gaming Board, Illinois Department of Revenue, Mark Ostrowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
