Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Daughtry v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 7:2018cv00180
Defendant:
Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Teresa V. Daughtry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rospond v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
Gabriela W. Rospond
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jennette v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Carmen B. Jennette
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardee v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv00154
Plaintiff:
Linda J. Hardee
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENDON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al
as 1:2017cv01000
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. HENDON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McWatty v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 7:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Lorna McWatty
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelton v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Brenda Shelton
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
