Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Basic Management Inc., et al. v. USA, et al
as 2:2002cv00884
Intervenor Plaintiff:
American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
Defendant:
PLC Astrazeneca, Atlantic Richfield Company, Aventis SA and others
Counter Claimant:
Atlantic Richfield Company
Cross Claimant:
Atlantic Richfield Company
Intervenor Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Company and United States of America
Counter Defendant:
Basic Environmental Company, LLC, Basic Management, Inc. and Basic Remediation Company, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Basic Environmental Company, LLC, Basic Management, Inc. and Basic Remediation Company, LLC.
Cross Defendant:
United States Of America
202) 305 0506 (fax:
Thomas L. Sansonetti and Thomas L. Sansonetti
702) 243-7059 (fax:
Ruth L. Cohen and Ruth L. Cohen
202) 353-7763 (fax:
Tara M Bahn and Tara M Bahn
Unknown:
Todd W Gleason, Steven W. Myhre, Todd W Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
JFE Steel Corporation v. ICI Americas, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00633
Plaintiff:
JFE Steel Corporation
Defendant:
ICI Americas, Inc. and Imperial Chemical Industries PLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HAWTHORNE v. ARKEMA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00976
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. HAWTHORNE, RICHARD B. HAWTHORNE, HAWTHORNE PAINTING and others
Defendant:
ARKEMA, INC., ARKEMA, INC., ARKEMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ACE CONCRETE v. ARKEMA INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00488
Plaintiff:
ACE CONCRETE, ACE CONCRETE and ACE CONCRETE
Defendant:
ARKEMA INC., ARKEMA S.A., SARTOMER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hawthorne et al v. Arkema, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00011
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Hawthorne, Richard B. Hawthorne, Hawthorne Painting and others
Defendant:
Arkema, Inc., Arkema S.A., Arkema S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
