Cases 1 - 10 of 15,755
West Prairie Village MHP LLC et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Defendant:
3M Company, RTX Corporation, Minnesota Mining Manufacturing Co and others
Plaintiff:
West Prairie Village MHP LLC and Conwin Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Loomer v. Vaagen Bros. Lumber, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Brewster Loomer
Defendant:
Vaagen Bros. Lumber, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Northwest Administrators Inc v. MK Maintenance LLC
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
MK Maintenance LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Northwest Administrators Inc v. CY Expo LLC
as 2:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
CY Expo LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Remington v. Refresco Beverages US Inc et al
as 4:2024cv05064
Plaintiff:
Eric Remington
Defendant:
Refresco Beverages US Inc and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Jackson Bevco Inc. v. Big Smoke and Convenience LLC
as 1:2024cv03087
Plaintiff:
Jackson Bevco Inc.
Defendant:
Big Smoke and Convenience LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Reiss v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
CD Reiss
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
BVB Express, LLC v. Straight Logistics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
BVB Express, LLC
Defendant:
Straight Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SonoSuite SL v. Rhapsody International Inc
as 2:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
SonoSuite S.L.
Defendant:
Rhapsody International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
