Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Crystal Murdock v. East Coast Mtg Corp, et al
as 11-3503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK
Plaintiff:
MURDOCK, Husband of Crystal Murdock
Defendant - Appellee:
EAST COAST MTG CORP, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for IndyMac Bank, FSB and IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB, CITIMORTGAGE and others
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al v. MURDOCK et al
as 2:2010cv05360
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK and MURDOCK
Thirdparty_defendant:
INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB , EAST COAST MORTGAGE CORP., INDYMAC BANK HOME LOAN SERVICING and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al v. MURDOCK et al
as 1:2010cv05360
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK , MURDOCK and JOSEPH VETERI, ESQ.
Cross_claimant:
JOSEPH VETERI, ESQ. , PRUDENTIAL FOX & ROACH REALTORS and Zucker Goldberg & Ackerman
Cross_defendant:
ABC through XYZ CORPORATIONS, CITIMORTGAGE , EAST COAST MORTGAGE CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
McCabe Weisberg & Conway , Zucker Goldberg & Ackerman , Erica Johnson-Seck and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK
Counter_claimant:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK
Counter_defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
IndyMac Federal Bank FSB v. Delamata
as 4:2009cv01046
Plaintiff:
IndyMac Federal Bank FSB
Defendant:
Joshua Delamata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Indymac Federal Bank, FSB v. Grountovitch
as 3:2009cv01044
Plaintiff:
Indymac Federal Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Dmitri Grountovitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BLACKMORE et al v. WITTER et al
as 2:2009cv00640
Plaintiff:
PETER BLACKMORE and DAUNNE BLACKMORE
Defendant:
ANTHEA WITTER, INDYMAC BANK, FSB, INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
