Cases
Jackson Women's Hlth Org v. Dobbs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-60455
Plaintiff / Appellee: JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, on behalf of itself and its patients and SACHEEN CARR-ELLIS, M.D., M.P.H., on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant: KENNETH CLEVELAND, M.D., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS E. DOBBS, M.D., M.P.H., in his official capacity as State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health
Amicus Curiae: Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson, Mississippi, Roman Catholic Diocese of Biloxi, Mississippi, Information Society Project at Yale Law School and others
NIFLA, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-55249
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FAMILY AND LIFE ADVOCATES, a Virginia corporation, DBA NIFLA, PREGNANCY CARE CENTER, a California corporation, DBA Pregnancy Care Clinic and FALLBROOK PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee: KAMALA HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of California, THOMAS MONTGOMERY, in his official capacity as County Counsel for San Diego County, MORGAN FOLEY, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City of El Cajon, CA and others
Amicus Curiae: JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, PHYSICIANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH and INFORMATION SOCIETY PROJECT AT YALE LAW SCHOOL
First Resort, Inc. v. Dennis Herrera, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-15434
Plaintiff - Appellant: FIRST RESORT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: DENNIS J. HERRERA, in his official capacity as City Attorney of the City of San Francisco, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Amicus Curiae: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE, CALIFORNIA WOMEN LAWYERS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?