Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
In re: American Rivers, et al v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 21-16961
Not Classified By Court: In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Intervenor: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Defendant: ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
In re: American Rivers, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al
as 21-16958
Not Classified By Court: In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant: ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
In re: American Rivers, et al v. National Hydropower Associatio, et al
as 21-16960
Not Classified By Court: In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Suquamish Tribe et al v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2020cv06137
Defendant: Andrew Wheeler and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff: Columbia Riverkeeper, Suquamish Tribe, Sierra Club and others
Intervenor Defendant: Interstate Natural Gas Association of America and American Petroleum Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. Wheeler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04869
Defendant: andrew r. wheeler and united states environmental protection agency
Plaintiff: state of north carolina, state of minnesota, state of maryland and others
Intervenor: Montana, State of, Arkansas, State of, National Hydropower Association and others
Intervenor Defendant: State of Texas, State of West Virginia, State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04636
Defendant: Andrew R. Wheeler and US Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff: Idaho Rivers United, California Trout, American Whitewater and others
Intervenor Defendant: Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, American Petroleum Institute and National Hydropower Association
Intervenor: Montana, State of, Mississippi, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35432
Plaintiff / Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35415
Plaintiff / Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae: ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35414
Plaintiff / Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, STATE OF MONTANA, AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae: ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35412
Plaintiff / Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Defendant / Appellant: TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Amicus Curiae: ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?