Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Perez v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01624
Plaintiff:
Iris Perez
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Morales et al v. Rembisz et al
as 3:2020cv00192
Defendant:
Adam Rembisz, Jonathan Webster, Karl Mortasiewicz and others
Plaintiff:
Irianys Morales, Iris Gracia and Benjamin Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo et al v. Northland Investment Corp. et al
as 3:2018cv01804
Plaintiff:
Sasha Calixto, Jivanlee Perez, Sasha Calixto and Jaen Perez PPA Jewel Perez and others
Defendant:
Northland Fund II, LP, Church Street New Haven LLC, Northland Fund II Partners, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Calixmarie Guzman, J.G., J.Z.G. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vicente v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00921
Plaintiff:
Iris Celestina Vicente
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martinez Rodriguez v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01627
Defendant:
Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Ms. Ana Iris Martinez Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Morales v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv01671
Plaintiff:
Iris Morales
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Intercarrier Communication, LLCs v. IRIS Wireless, LLC
as 3:2015mc00046
Plaintiff:
Intercarrier Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Iris Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
Cruz v. Hitchcock Munson Opticians, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
Norma Iris Cruz
Defendant:
Hitchcock Munson Opticians, Inc. and Harold Munson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00354
Plaintiff:
Iris Sujein Torres
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
