Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Considerate Commerce Inc v. ISP Electronics LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Considerate Commerce, Inc. and Considerate Commerce Inc
Defendant:
ISP Electronics, LLC, ISP TEK Services, LLC, Captive Trade Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mahmood Mansornia, Mahmood Osorio, Ooody Osorio and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
ISP TEK Services LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Supercub Holdings, LLC et al. v. GOT Distribution SPV, LLC
as 4:2023cv00888
Plaintiff:
Supercub Holdings, LLC, Stephen Discher, ISP Supplies LLC and others
Defendant:
GOT Distribution SPV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Stuntz v. Ashland Elastomers, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00173
Plaintiff:
Michael David Stuntz
Defendant:
Ashland Elastomers, LLC, ISP Synthetic Elastomers, LP and ISP Synthetic Elastomers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Perez, U. S. Secretary of Labor v. ISPE Produce, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez, U. S. Secretary of Labor
Defendant:
ISPE Produce, Inc. , Isidoro Perez , Jorge A Quevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ISP Technologies, Inc. v. Next Generation Films, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
ISP Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Next Generation Films, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinder Morgan Petcoke, L.L.P. d/b/a Kinder Morgan Engineering & Conveying v. ISP International, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2009cv04144
Plaintiff:
Kinder Morgan Petcoke, L.L.P. d/b/a Kinder Morgan Engineering & Conveying
Defendant:
ISP International, L.L.C., Sam Faber and Southern Cross Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
