Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Israel Schvimmer v. Roderick Randall
as 22-2851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Israel Schvimmer and Miriam Schvimmer
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Police Detective Buckner, of the 79th Precinct, David A. Hansell, (Reg. #1950179) individually and as NYC Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services, Rebecca Elizabeth Szewczuk, (Reg. #4686903) individually and as Attorney for NYC ACS-Kings County (Family Court) and Attorney for Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and others
Defendant:
The Office of Court Administration, New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and others
Connolly v. The City of New York
as 20-3125
Defendant / Appellee:
Susan Starker, Paul Savarese, Joseph Cardieri and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Delano Connolly
I. (Anonymous) v. The Office of Court Administra
as 20-714
Defendant / Appellee:
Karen McNeely, individually and as Caseworker for NYC-ACS, Carmalita Cyrus, individually and as Supervisor #1 for NYC-ACS, Jeanette Vega-Alvarez, (LIC #041405) individually and as NYC-ACS Supervisor FSU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Miriam Schvimmer and Israel Schvimmer
I. (Anonymous) et al v. The Office of Court Administration et al
as 1:2018cv07419
Defendant:
Nicholas P. Smith, Rabbi Azriel Juda Katz, Jonathen Caceras and others
Plaintiff:
I. (Anonymous), M. (Anonymous), Miriam Schvimmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Pitchal et al
as 1:2018cv06624
Defendant:
Ethan Wolf, Avinash Maharaji, Lauren Michelle Wolfinger and others
Plaintiff:
Roman Cacidas Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00465
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
