Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. I-Blason, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03774
Defendant:
I-Blason, LLC and Congjing Technology (Shenzhen) Co. Limited
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
ICON Health & Fitness Inc v. Davis
as 2:2019cv00449
Defendant:
Anthony Davis and Anthony Davis an individual d/b/a IFIT Sports Performance
Plaintiff:
ICON Health & Fitness Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. iFit Personal Training LLC et al
as 6:2017cv00715
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
iFit Personal Training LLC and Bryant A. Roper
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Proform Pt, LLC
as 6:2015cv01887
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
ProForm PT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Alter v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv01285
Plaintiff:
David Alter
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Icon Health & Fitness Inc v. GOODWIN
as 4:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness Inc
Defendant:
TIMOTHY J GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Icon Health & Fitness Inc. v. TITSHAW
as 3:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness Inc.
Defendant:
MEG TITSHAW
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Bilstein v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00529
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Bilstein
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. IFITNESS, INC.
as 1:2012cv20125
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
IFITNESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Daniel v. Nordictrack Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
Cecil Daniel
Defendant:
Nordictrack Inc , Icon Health & Fitness Inc and Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
