Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Deswal v. US National Association
as 14-2169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sunita Deswal and Pars Singh
Defendant - Appellee:
US National Association, as Trustee Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 200616AX Mortgage PassThrough Certificates, Series 200616AX, Ideal Mortgage Bankers Ltd., DBA Lend America, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, AKA GMAC Mortgage and others
Deswal et al v. US National Association et al
as 1:2013cv03354
Plaintiff:
Sunita Deswal and Pars Singh
Defendant:
General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Ideal Mortgage Bankers Ltd., Ocwen Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Manginelli et al v. Homeward Residential, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02334
Plaintiff:
Anthony Botsakos, Erick Caceres, Noreen Gribek and others
Defendant:
Homeward Residential, Inc. and Ideal Mortgage Bankers, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Mendy v. Ideal Mortgage Bankers, Ltd. et al
as 1:2009cv08919
Petitioner:
Edward B. Mendy
Respondent:
Ideal Mortgage Bankers, Ltd., Steve Cavalcante, Jason Monshine and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
United States of America v. Ideal Mortgage Bankers, LTD et al
as 2:2009cv04484
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Ideal Mortgage Bankers, LTD and Michael Howard Ashley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ideal Mortgage Bankers, Ltd. v. Donovan et al
as 2:2009cv02005
Plaintiff:
Ideal Mortgage Bankers, Ltd. and Ideal Mortgage Bankers, Ltd.
Defendant:
Shaun Donovan and The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
