Cases 21 - 30 of 50
HILL v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.
as 2:2010cv64607
Plaintiff:
BETTY S. HILL
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonnie Horan, etc. v. Illinois Central Railroad Co.
as ILN/1:09-CV-07637
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Horan, etc.
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Co.
Lyons v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. et al
as 3:2010cv00009
Petitioner:
Jennifer Lyons
Respondent:
Illinois Central Railroad Co. and National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Hill v. Illinois Central Railroad
as 3:2009cv01866
Plaintiff:
Betty S Hill
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Lyons v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. et al
as 1:2009cv03444
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lyons
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Co. and National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
IN RE: Koppers, Inc.
as 09-60127
Petitioner:
In re: KOPPERS INC, formerly known as Koppers Industries Inc, BEAZER EAST INC and ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO
Respondent:
KAY HOBBS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
WALTER HOBBS, DAVID HILL, ALICE HILL and others
Beck, et al v. Koppers Inc, et al
as 09-5
Plaintiff - Respondent:
KAY HOBBS, WALTER HOBBS, DAVID HILL and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
KOPPERS INC, formerly known as Koppers Industries Inc, BEAZER EAST INC and ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO
Rubert Ellington v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., et al.
as ILS/3:07-CV-00319
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Co
Plaintiff:
Rubert Ellington
Miciotto v. Brown, et al
as 07-30284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH R MICIOTTO
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP, also known as Amtrak, CANADIAN NATIONAL/ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Baker v. Can Natl/IL Ctrl RR
as 06-60138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CANADIAN NATIONAL/ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
