Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Dillard v. Lashbrook
as 1:2018cv07780
Respondent:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, State of Illinois and Jacqueline Lashbrook
Petitioner:
Jerrel Dillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newton v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv03240
Respondent:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Kimberly Smith
Undetermined:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Keith B Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kitterman v. Dennison et al
as 3:2018cv01696
Respondent:
Illinois Prisoner Review Board (PRB), Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) and Jeffrey Dennison
Petitioner:
Shane A Kitterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kitterman v. Dennison et al
as 3:2018cv03218
Respondent:
Illinois Prisoner Review Board (PRB), Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) and Jeffrey Dennison
Petitioner:
Shane A Kitterman
Undetermined:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nichols v. Nicholson
as 1:2018cv03387
Petitioner:
Demetrius Nichols
Respondent:
Illinois Department Of Corrections
Defendant:
Walter Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nichols v. Illinois Department Of Corrections
as 1:2018cv02896
Petitioner:
Demetrius Nichols
Respondent:
Illinois Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Brum et al
as 3:2017cv00622
Petitioner:
Maurice Davis
Respondent:
Tracy Brum and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miguel Rivera v. John Baldwin
as 17-2013
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections
Miguel Rivera v. John Baldwin
as 17-1592
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections
Miguel Rivera v. John R. Baldwin
as 16-4031
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
