Cases filed in Alabama
Creighton v. Tube City IMS, LLC
as 1:2018cv00243
Plaintiff: Climmie Creighton
Defendant: Tube City IMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bocage et al v. Acton Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01201
Plaintiff: Jordan Bocage , Sheila Garrett and Joel Kelly
Defendant: Acton Corporation, IM Records Inc, Pro Impact Physical Therapy & Sports Performance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv01030
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Abrams v. Tube City, IMS, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00105
Plaintiff: Lecedrick Abrams
Defendant: Tube City, IMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Sears v. Tube City IMS, LLC
as 1:2014cv00230
Plaintiff: Jan Sears
Defendant: Tube City IMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tube City IMS, LLC v. Payne Superior Automotive, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00519
Plaintiff: Tube City IMS, LLC
Defendant: Payne Superior Automotive, Inc. , Diversified Mill Contractors, Inc. , THS Investments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Birmingham Rail & Locomotive Company, Inc v. International Mill Service, Inc et al
as 7:2009cv02167
Plaintiff: Birmingham Rail & Locomotive Company, Inc
Defendant: International Mill Service, Inc, International Mill Service, Inc, Tube City IMS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Type: Contract None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv01965
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00393
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?