Cases 11 - 17 of 17
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 132 Health and Welfare Fund v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp et al
as 3:2013cv03583
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 132 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp, IMPAX Laboratories, Inc. , Lupin Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Haverhill Retirement System v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 3:2013cv01566
Plaintiff:
Haverhill Retirement System
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., , Larry Hsu , Arthur A. Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Mulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 3:2013cv01037
Plaintiff:
Denis Mulligan
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., Larry Hsu, Arthur A. Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Apotex Inc. et al
as 4:2013mc80026
Plaintiff:
Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Defendant:
Apotex Inc., Apotex Corp., Perrigo Israel Pharmaceutical Ltd. and others
Miscellaneou:
Impax Laboratories, Inc.,
Impax Laboratories, Inc., v. Shire, LLC et al
as 3:2011mc80206
Plaintiff:
Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant:
Shire, LLC and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
McKesson Corporation
Leighty v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd et al
as 2:2009cv01640
Plaintiff:
Andrea Leighty and Andrea Leighty
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Impax Laboratories Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., et al v. USDC-CAN
as 08-73740
:
In re: IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.
Petitioner:
IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., BARRY EDWARDS, CORNEL SPIEGLER and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
DEARBORN HEIGHTS ACT 345 POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS and MELVIN M. OWEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
