Cases 1 - 10 of 22,625
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Keysor et al v. Uncle Julio's Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Audrey Keysor, Cyle Quick and Liv Wysocki
Defendant:
Uncle Julio's Corporation and The Mexican Restaurant, Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pace v. OneMain Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Value Plus, Inc. v. Cubework.com, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Value Plus, Inc.
Defendant:
Cubework.com, Inc. doing business as Superflea by Cubework.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Perficient, Inc. v. Draeger
as 4:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Perficient, Inc.
Defendant:
Ronald Draeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
McBride v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Richard McBride
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adolph v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Doris Adolph
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lopez v. Prestige Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Bertha Lopez
Defendant:
Prestige Financial Services, Inc. and GMT Auto Sales, Inc. doing business as GMT Auto Sales-West
Cross Defendant:
Anastacio Humberto Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
