Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Clark et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00995
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation , Advanced Composites Group, Aii Acquisitions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Clark and Michele Clark
Cross_claimant:
Ameron International Corp. , Chicago Bridge & Iron Company , General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Ameron International Corp. , Chicago Bridge & Iron Company , AERCO International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kelleher v. Boeing Company, et al
as 3:2015cv00893
Defendant:
Beazer East, Inc., CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelleher
Cross Defendant:
Sprinkmann Insulation Inc., United Technologies Corporation and Rohr Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Tucker et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joe Donald Tucker and Cora May Tucker
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., All Acquisitions, LLC, Air & Liquid Systems Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Afton Pumps, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00140
Defendant:
Afton Pumps, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation, Ameron International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ellis
Cross_claimant:
Crane Co. , Ingersoll-Rand Company , The Gorman-Rupp Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Crane Co. , A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nesser et al v. Advanced Composites Group et al
as 3:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nesser and Karen Nesser
Defendant:
Advanced Composites Group, AERCO International, Inc., Allied Manfacturing, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , AERCO International, Inc., Advanced Composites Group and others
Cross_claimant:
ITT Corporation and Crane Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Madaris et al v. Adel Wiggins, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01223
Defendant:
Adel Wiggins, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc., Dana Companies, LLC. and others
Counter Defendant:
Flowserve Corp., Ameron International Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Lear Siegler Diversified Holding, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc., Hysol and others
Cross Claimant:
Ingersoll Rand Company and General Electric Company
Plaintiff:
James E Madaris, Jr and Sandra S Madaris
Counter Claimant:
Industrial Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Webb v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00218
Defendant:
Avocet Enterprises, Inc., CBS Corporation, Flowserve Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Kieffer-Moseley v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01313
Plaintiff:
Delores J Kieffer-Moseley and Delores J Kiefer-Moseley
Defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Armstrong International Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation , Industrial Holding Corporation , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation , Air & Liquid System Corporation , Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bode v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01310
Plaintiff:
Jason Bode
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Ameron International Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company , Industrial Holding Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company , Industrial Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01221
Defendant:
Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), Welco Manufacturing Company, Murco Wall Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Mohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
