Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Fuss v. Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01581
Plaintiff:
Ray Scott Fuss
Defendant:
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc., Circle K Stores, Inc., City Hive Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Hamlett v. Ingles Markets, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01488
Plaintiff:
Clarence Hamlett
Defendant:
Ingles Markets, Inc., Safety National Casaulty Corp. and Joshua Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Ross v. Ingles Markets Inc et al
as 1:2023cv04599
Plaintiff:
Donna Ross
Defendant:
Ingles Markets Inc, ABC Corps #1-3 and John Does #1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ward v. Capps et al
as 1:2023cv02462
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Ward
Defendant:
Paul Adam Capps, Ingles Markets, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Perez v. Ingles Markets, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00650
Defendant:
Ingles Markets, Inc., ABC Corporation, XYZ Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PITTS v. CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICE LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00328
Plaintiff:
ERNEST PITTS, JR
Defendant:
CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICE LLC, INGLES MARKETS INC and SHANNON SWERDZEWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cunningham v. Ingles Markets, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Ingles Markets, Inc. and Grand Rapids Chair Company
Plaintiff:
Mary Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. INGLES MARKETS INC
as 3:2020cv00018
Defendant:
INGLES MARKETS INC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
TAYLOR v. INGLES MARKETS INC
as 5:2020cv00043
Defendant:
INGLES MARKETS INC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
