Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Inman v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09808
Plaintiff:
A. Debra Inman
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv09172
Plaintiff:
Debra a Inman and Unknown
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Saint-Fleur v. Wilmarth et al
as 3:2023cv50070
Plaintiff:
Franck Saint-Fleur
Defendant:
C. Wilmarth, T. Albertson, G. Inman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tinch v. Inman et al
as 1:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
Tekoa Quatrell Tinch
Defendant:
Stewart Inman, Sherri Martin, Tony Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv01901
Plaintiff:
Shawn Inman
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Inman et al v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03737
Plaintiff:
Alexis Inman and Daniel Windley
Defendant:
Mead Johnson & Company LLC and Mead Johnson Nutrition Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Andrade v. Inman et al
as 1:2022cv01197
Plaintiff:
Joel Andrade
Defendant:
S Inman, . Draper, . Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crane v. Childress et al
as 1:2022cv01153
Plaintiff:
Travis Crane
Defendant:
Tony Childress, Stewart Inman, Lisa Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Inman et al
as 1:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Inman, Baker, Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
