Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Randeep Mann v. USA, et al
as 22-5286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randeep Singh Mann
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Office of Attorney General, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-5190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
LABRANCHE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02768
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE LABRANCHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MANN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2020cv01337
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00739
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Aror O'Diah v. Richard Cordray, et al
as 17-5170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aror Ark O'diah
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Cordray, Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, JPMorgan Chase & Co., also known as JPMorgan Chase Corporate, also known as Chase Bank and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
