Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 131
United HealthCare Services Inc. v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00545
Plaintiff: United HealthCare Services Inc.
Defendant: Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Costa Mesa et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02320
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: City of Costa Mesa and The People of the State of California
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Santa Ana et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv02324
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Santa Ana City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho and CITY OF SANTA ANA
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of San Clemente et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02326
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through San Clemente City Attorney Scott C. Smith and City of San Clemente
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Westminster et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02325
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Westminster City Attorney Richard D. Jones and City of Westminster
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bannock County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00151
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amerisourcebergen Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Bannock County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County of Yolo, et al., v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00813
Defendant: Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: County of Yolo, The People of the State of California and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Feather River Tribal Health, Inc. v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 5:2019cv00823
Defendant: H. D. Smith, LLC d/b/a HD Smith, f/k/a H. D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co., BEVERLY SACKLER, ALLERGAN PLC F/K/A ACTAVIS PLC F/K/A ALLERGAN, INC. and others
Plaintiff: Feather River Tribal Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Yolo, County of v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2019at00353
Defendant: Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Yolo, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Alameda, California v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through County Counsel Donna Ziegler et al
as 3:2019cv02317
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, JONATHAN D. SACKLER, an individual and as trustee for TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF MEMBERS OF THE RAYMOND SACKLER FAMILY and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through County Counsel Donna Ziegler and County of Alameda, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?