Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Avery v. United States Government et al
as 1:2015mc00211
Plaintiff:
Cecil Avery
Defendant:
United States Government and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Gandrup v. United State of America, Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2015mc00038
Petitioner:
Jim Gandrup
Respondent:
United State of America, Internal Revenue Service and Julieta Johnson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Gandrup v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014mc00123
Movant:
Jim Gandrup
Respondent:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Julieta Johnson
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Power v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2013cv00761
Plaintiff:
Carl R. Power
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: USA et al.
as 1:2013mc00110
Movant:
Barry Knudsen
Respondent:
USA, Internal Revenue Service and Gregory Allison
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Meconi v. United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) et al
as 1:2012cv01033
Plaintiff:
Patrick Meconi
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS), T. Jenkins, N. Ayotte and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Curl v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Curl
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Curl v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2009cv00933
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Curl
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
In re: Patricia Littleton
as 1:2008mc00197
Petitioner:
USA, Sue Fawley and Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Patricia Littleton
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type:
Other Statutes
Owens v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Ushango Owens
Defendant:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
